Legal Opinion

VanCleve v. City of Marinette

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 18, 2001No. 01-0231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. Wisconsin Stat. § 81.17 provides conditional protection to a municipality when it is sued along with, for example, a contractor for injuries caused by highway defects. If both the municipality and the contractor are found liable, regardless of the apportionment between them, the contractor is responsible for the entire award, if it can pay. The municipality must pay only if the contractor is unable to pay. However, what happens when the contractor settles with the injured person for less than the amount of the ultimate award? Must the municipality then pay the balance? That is the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. VanCleve v. City of MarinetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API