Legal Opinion
Wright v. Melendez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
"Summary judgment is an appropriate vehicle for determining whether a plaintiff can establish, prima facie, a serious *338injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Zoldas v Louise Cab Corp., 108 AD2d 378, 381).
In support of his motion for summary judgment, the appellant submitted, inter alia, the injured plaintiffs chiropractor’s report and a verified bill of particulars. The medical evidence indicated that the injured plaintiff had suffered a cervical sprain. In response to the appellant’s motion, the injured plaintiff offered his attorney’s affirmation, his chiropractor’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dwyer v. TraceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Zoldas v. Louise Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Filippo v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Popp v. KremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Padron v. HoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Partlow v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sundack v. Power Test Petro Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Zaccara v. GoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Partlow v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Rodriguez v. BurchetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995