Legal Opinion

Voilé Manufacturing Corp. v. Dandurand

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 17, 2008No. 2:07-cr-00396PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION

TENA CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

BACKGROUND

This motion for a preliminary injunction involves a dispute over U.S. Patent No. 6,877,759 (the “'759 patent.”) The '759 patent covers a ski binding with certain structural elements. The '759 patent’s specification generally describes a step-in binding for use in telemark skiing, a form of skiing where the heel of the ski boot is allowed to come off the ski. Some, but not all, of the claims in the '759 patent are expressly directed at step-in ski bindings. Step-in ski bindings allow a skier to simply place his or her boot in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salinger v. ColtingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  3. Anderson v. TOL, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
  4. Quad/Tech, Inc. v. Q.I. Press Controls B.V.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Everett Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API