Legal Opinion

Pajooh v. State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The challenged no probable cause determination was rationally based and not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, 111-113 [1998]). DHR has broad discretion in determining the method to be employed in investigating a claim, and the record shows that the investigation in this case was not “abbreviated or one-sided” (Matter of Pascual v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 37 AD3d 215, 216 [2007]; see also McFarland, 241 AD2d at 111-113).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur —…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFarland v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Pascual v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baird v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Baird v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Jian Hua Tan v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Jian Hua Tan v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API