McFarland v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J. P.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, Condé Nast Publications Inc., petitioner Keith McFarland’s former employer, appeals from an IAS Court order annulling the New York State Division of Human Rights’ finding of no probable cause with respect to petitioner’s claim that Condé Nast unlawfully discriminated against him based on race and, because of the Division’s purportedly one-sided and abbreviated investigation of the complaint, remanding the matter for further investigation.1 Since the administrative record belies the IAS Court’s conclusion and supports as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taber v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Chirgotis v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Giles v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hone v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bal v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Goston v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Pascual v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sonne v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pajooh v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Soo Ching Wu v. New York City Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.