Legal Opinion

Szymanski v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 7, 2002No. 99-P-1756PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

At issue is the defendant insurer’s promotional materials and representations made by its insurance agent indicating that a so-called “vanishing-premiums” life insurance policy sold to the plaintiff would accumulate sufficient value in nine years to cover the cost of the annual premiums thereafter.1 A judge of the Superior Court allowed the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of statutes of limitations. We reverse.

Background. In 1986, the plaintiff, James Szymanski,2 then a foreman with an associate’s degree in manufacturing, owned a fully paid $5,000 life insurance policy…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Frith v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  5. Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Scott M. Epstein v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Futuremed Interventional, Inc. Crossbow Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. Weathers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Stolzoff v. Waste Systems International, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Harrington v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Loguidice v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API