Legal Opinion

McLendon v. Western & Atlantic Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

The hill of exceptions alleges as error the refusal of the court below to strike the answer of the garnishee (the defendant in error). It appears from the bill of exceptions that a motion for a new trial by the plaintiff in error, the grounds of which motion are in part the same as those contained in the bill of exceptions, is still pending in the court below. A motion was made here to dismiss the writ of error, upon the ground that the case is still pending in the court below. We think the writ of error was prosecuted prematurely. If the motion to dismiss the garnishee’s…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duke v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Peyton v. RyleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Sellers v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Battle v. HambrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Petersen v. Ohio Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API