Peyton v. Rylee
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
In amplification of his grounds of the motion the plaintiff in error makes the specific point that the court should have charged the jury that in order for complainant to prevail, she must, promptly on discovery of the fraud, restore or offer to restore whatever she has received by virtue of the contract, he contending that the undisputed evidence showed that a moneyed consideration had been paid, and that there had been no restoration and no offer to restore. The judge dealt with this question in his order, as shown by the preceding statement of facts. He was of the opinion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clark v. GansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Howell v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Smith v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Humphries v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Peacock Construction Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Chambers v. Peacock Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Dugas v. DugasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Maxwell v. CoferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Luke v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.