People v. SUPERIOR COURT (MITCHELL)
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMANN-GERST, J.
In the underlying murder case against Thomas Jerome Mitchell (Mitchell), the trial court excluded multiple prosecution witnesses, dog scent evidence and gunshot residue evidence as a sanction for the People’s failure to provide discovery. By way of writ petition, the People contend that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction under Penal Code section 1054.5, subdivision (c) 1 because it was required to exhaust less drastic sanctions first. 2 We agree and grant the petition.
FACTS
In 2006, Mitchell was charged with the murder of Nicole Kaster (Kaster) for the benefit of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- (HC) Hernandez v. GamboaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- P. v. Superior Court CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Bonner CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Superior Court (Mitchell)California Supreme Court · 2024