Burlingame v. Brewster
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Edwin S. Leland, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
Suit was brought against the appellant, Burlingame, alone, on a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“Earlville, III., Jan. 1, 1871.
“One year after date I promise to pay Joseph Brewster, or order, the sum of four hundred and sixty 70-100 dollars, at the office of the Exchange Bank, Earlville, 111., with ten per cent interest from date, until paid.
“C. C. Warren,
“Thomas Pendieu,
(Signed.) “Chas. M. Smith,
“A. C. Burlingame.”
Defense was interposed bv pleas filed for that purpose, setting up, in substance, that the consideration of the note was building material purchased by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sturdivant v. HullSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
- Andrews v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1834
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marx & Blum v. Luling Co-Operative Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Waugh v. SuterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
- Wilson v. FridenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- St. Vincent College v. HallettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Catlett v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.