Legal Opinion

Marx & Blum v. Luling Co-Operative Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1897PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Bon. W. B. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

This action was begun on the 16th day of November, 1895, by appellants against the association, a private corporation, upon two promissory notes of date March 29, 1895, one for $536.87, due October 15, 1895, and one for $536.88, due November-10, 1895, both bearing 8 per cent interest from maturity, and stipulating for the payment of 10 per cent additional as attorneys’ fees, in case they were placed in the hands of attorneys for collection, and -against the other appellees individually, as guarantors upon the following instrument:

“Luling, March 30, 1895.
“Messrs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Texas Land & Cattle Co. v. Carroll & IlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Latham v. Houston Flour MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Traynham v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. McIlhenny Co. v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor-Made Hose, Inc. v. Wilkerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Gulf & Basco Co. v. Buchanan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. American Petrofina Company of Texas v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Schauer v. MorganMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Owens v. William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API