Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Kelly

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1908No. Crim. No. 1500PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the chief justice.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

In April, 1897, the petitioner was sentenced to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment in the Folsom state prison for the crime of burglary. Under the law allowing credits for good conduct—all of which he earned during the period of his confinement—his term would have expired on the fourteenth day of September, 1906. He was, however, discharged from the prison on May 15, 1905, in obedience to a conditional pardon or commutation of his sentence by Governor Pardee. The condition of his release was stated in the proviso: “that if, after said day of discharge, said Frank Kelly shall be convicted…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wilborn v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Jamison v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. People ex rel. Brackett v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API