Legal Opinion
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Valence Operating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1999No. 98-6314, 98-6327PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. filed a diversity action against Valence Operating Company to collect its proportionate share of the costs of drilling, completing, and operating an oil and gas well known as the “Fell 1-22” .located in a 160-acre quarter section in Grady County, OMahoma. A jury verdict found Valence liable to Chesapeake for well costs in the stipulated amount of $284,262.09 under a November 1995 agreement between the parties. Chesapeake filed a post-trial motion for prejudgment interest, which was granted by the district court, and for attorney fees, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- The Liberty National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, a National Banking Corporation v. Acme Tool Division of the Rucker CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Russo v. Ballard Medical ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- In Re SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.