Legal Opinion

Zipser v. Zipser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover on a promissory note and a guaranty given on another note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered May 23, 1997, which denied her motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While the plaintiff submitted proof of the promissory notes and the guaranty, and the failure to make the requisite payment (see, North Fork Bank v Rosen, 225 AD2d 598), the defendant raised a triable issue of fact regarding oral modification of the existing notes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. North Fork Bank v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fairchild Warehouse Associates, L. L. C. v. United Bank of Kuwait, P. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Fairchild Warehouse Associates, L. L. C. v. United Bank of Kuwait, PLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Vali Industries, Inc. v. Mega Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Vali Industries, Inc. v. Mega Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API