Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Hoskins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Suit to review a judgment upon the alleged discovery of material new matter. The substance of the complaint is as follows:

*219That the appellant was duly served with summons, on the 4th of February, 1873, to answer the appellee Joseph Hos-kins, in a suit founded on a promissory note alleged to have been made to him by the appellant, John Barrett and James T. Frazier, for the amount of one hundred and sixty-eight dollars, brought in the Court of Common Pleas for Shelby county; that he did not appear to said action, 44 because, in the year 1872, he did, in connection with John Barrett and James T.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Skinner v. DemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Simpkins v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Bartholomew v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Shelmire v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1829

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. DeweyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API