Legal Opinion

Narmah v. Waller Independent School District

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 25, 2008No. 01-08-00172-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

This is a restricted appeal from a final declaratory judgment in a bond-validation suit. Appellee, Waller Independent School District (“WISD”), has moved to dismiss the restricted appeal of appellant, David Narmah. Both parties have fully briefed the jurisdictional issue. Concluding that Narmah may not take a restricted appeal from a judgment in this type of suit, we grant WISD’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a).

Background

On March 13, 2008, this Court granted WISD’s unopposed motion to consider, as the record in this appeal, the record from a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckholts Independent School District v. GlaserTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY v. Dickens, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Leonard v. Cornyn, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Florance v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. Hotze v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. George Alejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Waller Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Bruce R. Hotze and Paul Bettencourt v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API