Legal Opinion

Duvall v. Ward

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1998No. PC-98-62PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EVI-DENTIARY HEARING AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

¶ 1 Petitioner, appearing pro se, has filed a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Discovery pursuant to “22 O.S.Supp.1987, § 1089(D)(5) and Rule 9.7D, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals to develop and establish the factual basis of claims advanced by Petitioner in his Application for Post-Conviction Relief filed contemporaneously with this motion_” (Motion for Eviden-tiary Hearing and Discovery, pg.l). Petitioner was convicted in a jury trial of first degree murder and sentenced to death.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Wayne Duvall v. Frank Keating, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, Gary Gibson, Warden of the Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Duvall v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Duvall v. WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API