Duvall v. Ward
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EVI-DENTIARY HEARING AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
¶ 1 Petitioner, appearing pro se, has filed a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Discovery pursuant to “22 O.S.Supp.1987, § 1089(D)(5) and Rule 9.7D, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals to develop and establish the factual basis of claims advanced by Petitioner in his Application for Post-Conviction Relief filed contemporaneously with this motion_” (Motion for Eviden-tiary Hearing and Discovery, pg.l). Petitioner was convicted in a jury trial of first degree murder and sentenced to death.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Wayne Duvall v. Frank Keating, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, Gary Gibson, Warden of the Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Duvall v. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Duvall v. WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998