Smith v. Sutherland
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident on March 21, 1976. Defendants admitted liability and the question of whether the injuries sustained resulted in a "serious impairment of body function”, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135, was submitted to a jury. A judgment of no cause of action was entered on the verdict returned and plaintiff appeals by right. We reverse.
The trial court instructed that plaintiff must demonstrate that her injuries resulted in a serious impairment of a body function before she could recover damages. But, in explaining the phrase…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wieczorek v. MerskinMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. U-Haul of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Burk v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Karas v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Burk v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Smith v. SutherlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979