Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sutherland

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1979No. Docket 78-1386Published

1Opinion of the Court

93 Mich. App. 24 (1979)

285 N.W.2d 784

SMITH

v.

SUTHERLAND

Docket No. 78-1386.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 15, 1979.

Rosenbaum, Bloom, Kaufman, Appel & Moses, for plaintiff.

Condit & McGarry, P.C., for defendant.

Before: N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and R.M. MAHER, JJ.

T.M. BURNS, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident on March 21, 1976. Defendants admitted liability and the question of whether the injuries sustained resulted in a "serious impairment of body function", MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135, was submitted to a jury. A judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wieczorek v. MerskinMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API