Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1895No. 599PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The statement of facts is most voluminous, embracing some fifty-six closely written pages of the transcript. The salient features of the evidence will be found sufficiently stated in the two opinions below.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYIDSOR, Judge.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a conviction of murder in the second degree, the punishment assessed being twenty years in the penitentiary.

The conviction is predicated entirely upon circumstantial evidence. Upon this subject the court charged the jury: “In order to warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, each fact necessary to the conclusion' sought to be established must be proved by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and all the facts necessary to such conclusion must be consistent with each other and with the main fact sought to be proved, and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Binns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Algheri v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  5. State v. ShelledySupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Shippy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  4. Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API