Legal Opinion

People v. Cisco

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1982No. Docket 51114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his guilty-plea conviction of breaking and entering an occupied dwelling with intent to commit larceny, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305.

Initially, defendant argues that the plea bargain was illusory and must be set aside. This contention is based upon the assertion that the prosecutor was precluded from filing habitual offender charges against defendant on the authority of People v Fountain, 407 Mich 96; 282 NW2d 168 (1979).

We disagree. The record repeatedly shows that defendant agreed during pretrial proceedings to plead guilty in exchange for a minimum sentence recommendation of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. FountainMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. TraylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. HaywoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. HutchersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchollNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. CiscoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. FalkenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API