Legal Opinion
Mauk v. Pioneer Ford Mercury
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 28, 2011No. A10A2320PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Presiding Judge.
Sheila Mauk bought a new Mustang in May 2007, and within three weeks brought it back to the dealership, Pioneer Ford Mercury, with complaints about the transmission. Over the next nine months Mauk brought the car back to the dealer for service eight times, but her complaints were not resolved, and in February 2008 she sent a letter to Pioneer, Ford Motor Company, and the lender SunTrust Bank seeking to revoke her acceptance of the car under OCGA § 11-2-608 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Mauk then filed a complaint against the three entities in May 2008, seeking…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Department of Human Resources v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Fiat Auto U. S. A., Inc. v. HollumsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Ford v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Jacobs v. Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Hub Motor Co. v. ZurawskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glass v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- CORY BENDER v. SOUTHTOWNE MOTORS OF NEWNAN II, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Jenry Villalobos v. Atlanta Motorsports Sales, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Wilson v. MarineMax E., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018