Legal Opinion

United States v. $6,190.00 in U.S. Currency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2009No. 08-35221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Maxim Lam is a fugitive from an Oregon state criminal proceeding. Before the state proceeding began, the federal government filed a civil forfeiture complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1355 against assets allegedly traceable to the criminal activity charged in the state court proceeding. After it became apparent that Lam had become a fugitive, the federal district court, acting under 28 U.S.C. § 2466, struck Lam’s claim to his assets in the civil forfeiture proceeding. Through an attorney, Lam appeals. He argues, first, that the district court lacked jurisdiction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. $525,695.24, Seized From JPMorgan Chase Bank Investment Account XXXXXXXXCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment ADistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. United States v. $1,152,366.18 in Funds from Bendura Bank Ag, Portfolio Number XX5.280District Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. United States v. $108,560.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
  5. United States v. $77,246.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API