United States v. $6,190.00 in U.S. Currency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Maxim Lam is a fugitive from an Oregon state criminal proceeding. Before the state proceeding began, the federal government filed a civil forfeiture complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1355 against assets allegedly traceable to the criminal activity charged in the state court proceeding. After it became apparent that Lam had become a fugitive, the federal district court, acting under 28 U.S.C. § 2466, struck Lam’s claim to his assets in the civil forfeiture proceeding. Through an attorney, Lam appeals. He argues, first, that the district court lacked jurisdiction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. $525,695.24, Seized From JPMorgan Chase Bank Investment Account XXXXXXXXCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment ADistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- United States v. $1,152,366.18 in Funds from Bendura Bank Ag, Portfolio Number XX5.280District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- United States v. $108,560.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
- United States v. $77,246.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024