Legal Opinion

United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment A

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 27, 2015No. Civil No. 1:14-cv-969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the government’s motion to strike the claims of Finn Batato (“Batato”); Julius Bencko (“Bencko”); Kim Dotcom (“Dotcom”); Sven Echter-nach (“Echternach”); Bram van der Kolk (“van der Kolk”); Mathias Ortmann (“Ort-mann”); and Megaupload Limited, Mega-pay Limited, Megamedia Limited, Megas-tuff Limited, and Vestor Limited (“the corporate claimants”). See Mot. to Strike, 1. In this civil in rem action, the United States seeks forfeiture of the assets listed in Attachment A to the complaint. All of the assets identified in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain NamesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Finn BatatoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. $108,560.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
  3. United States v. $40,175.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  4. United States v. Abhishek Krishnan's Real and Personal PropertyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020
  5. United States v. Finn BatatoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API