Legal Opinion

Aarco Oil & Gas Co. v. Eog Resources, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. 2008-CA-01219-SCTPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITCHENS, Justice,

for the court.

¶ 1. Both the plaintiffs and the defendants claim ownership to the mineral rights of two tracts of land situated in Covington County. The plaintiffs brought suit in the Covington County Chancery Court, alleging that the defendants’ interest in the property was derived from an invalid tax sale in 1942. The chancellor granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding that the tax sale was valid, and the plaintiffs appealed. 1 Finding no error, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

I. Facts

¶ 2. In 1940, the surface, and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. DEDEAUX UTILITY CO. v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  3. T.H. McElvain Oil & Gas Ltd. P'ship v. Benson-Montin-Greer Drilling Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Curtis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  5. City of Jackson v. Rebuild America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API