United States v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSmith McPHERSON, District Judge
(charging jury): This case has been fully heard by the court and jury on oral testimony, at the close of which each party moved for a peremptory direction for a verdict under every one of the four counts of the petition. It is my custom, and, as I think, my duty, when taking a case from the jury, to explain why that body can have nothing further to do in the case, I assuming all responsibility. This is an action by petition, under direction of the Attorney General, on information of the interstate commerce commission, against the defendant company for four alleged violations of the acts of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gray v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1912
- Jewel Tea Co. v. Lee's SummitU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1911
- Pacific Coast Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1907
- State v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.