Legal Opinion

Gray v. Louisville & N. R.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 3, 1912No. 1,529, at LawPublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Action by J. R. Gray against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. On plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Read the full summary

At Law. Action by J. R. Gray against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. On plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. This suit was brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of Tennessee, as administrator, against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., a citizen of Kentucky, and an interstate carrier of freight and passengers, to recover $20,-000.00 damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was killed while in the employment of the defendant as a switchman, by reason of . the ’ defendant’s alleged non-compliance with the provisions of the Federal Safety Appliance Act (Act March…

1Opinion of the Court

SANFORD, District Judge.

[1] 1. It is clear that under the undisputed facts of this case the movement of the defendant’s car on which the coupling apparatus had been destroyed and which was about to be attached to another car and removed to the repair shops was in violation of the Safety Appliance Act, under the doctrine of St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 210 U. S. 281, 28 Sup. Ct. 616, 52 L. Ed. 1061; Chicago Ry. Co. v. United States, 220 U. S. 559, 31 Sup. Ct. 612, 55 L. Ed. 582; Delk v. Railway Co., 220 U. S. 580, 31 Sup. Ct. 617, 55 L. Ed. 590; Southern Ry. Co. v. United States, 222 U. S. 20,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & O. S. W. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  2. Geraghty v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Hood v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Rush v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API