Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCarty v. Auto Club Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1994No. Docket 152272Published

1DissentMarilyn Kelly, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial court’s decision to *106award plaintiff costs and attorney fees. MCL 500.3148(1); MSA 24.13148(1).

Our Supreme Court has ruled that an insurer’s refusal to pay is reasonable under § 3148(1) when caused by a legitimate question of statutory construction, constitutional law or bona fide factual uncertainty. Gobler v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 428 Mich 51, 66; 404 NW2d 199 (1987). However, our Court has also concluded that we will not reverse on appeal a trial court’s finding of unreasonable refusal unless it is clearly erroneous. MCR 2.613(C); United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liddell v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Gobler v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Nelson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. United Southern Assurance Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Thomson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API