Legal Opinion

Pothos v. Urban Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1977No. Appeal, No. 625 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On April 2, 1973, the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (Authority) filed a declaration of taking condemning appellee’s property which is located at 201 Anderson Street, in the City of Pittsburgh. Two months later, the Authority filed a declaration of relinquishment with regard to appellee’s property, and thereby, title was revested in appellee. On February 4, 1974, the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County referred the case to a Board of Viewers (Board), pursuant to Section 408 of the Eminent Domain Code,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Van Cure v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Epley Land Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Condemn. by Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. In re Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API