Legal Opinion

Van Cure v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1969No. Appeals, Nos. 68 and 69PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mk. Justice Cohen,

This is an assumpsit action in which appellees, two insurance companies, denied coverage to appellant because at the time of the loss appellant no longer had an insurable interest. The facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows:

On March 10, 1961 the appellee, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, issued to Mrs. Van Cure (appellant) a three year policy covering the building and garage involved in this action. On January 11, 1963, the United States Fidelity and Guarantee Company did likewise. For the purposes of this opinion we shall consider the two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Lakewood Memorial Gardens, Inc. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Seligsohn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Heidisch v. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Dacar Chemical Products Co. v. Allegheny County Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Christ Gospel Temple v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Alberici v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Miller v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Groban v. S.S. PeguDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  5. Miernicki v. SeltzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API