Phelps v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.
Proof of the origin of fires usually presents a difficult, if not impossible, problem. It is extremely rare that direct evidence is available; consequently, as in this case, circumstantial evidence is the only available method in a large majority of actions, either civil or criminal.
The law in such cases is usually found where arson is charged or where railroad engines are alleged to have started the fire. Notwithstanding the necessity of its use in such cases, we cannot vary or liberalize the law of circumstantial evidence for this purpose.
Generally speaking, circumstantial evidence is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Maharias v. WEATHERS BROTHERS MOVING & STORAGE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Maguire v. S. A. L. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Mfg. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Peffer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Snow v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Williamson v. LiptzinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.