Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cox v. Kingsboro Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 1995Published

1Dissent

Miller, J. (dissenting).

My dissenting colleague Justice Goldstein and I dispute the majority’s conclusion that the defendants have met their burden, as movants for summary judgment, of tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate material issues of fact raised by the plaintiff (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851).

We shall proceed to identify several relevant issues of fact concerning the nature of the relationship between Kingsboro and Brookdale, Drs. Wolf and Levowitz, and Winston Cox, the patient of these care providers, which affect a determination of (1) whether a "relevant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Meath v. MishrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API