People v. Sanders
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of several charges including attempted murder and robbery stemming from the holdup of a numbers parlor in Brooklyn. In its charge to the jury the court failed to explain the essential elements of the several charges. Nor did it instruct the jury that the prosecution had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged. Instead, the court after posing the rhetorical question, "Now, what do the People have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BrittNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HofflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. CaicedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CotterellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. Nunez-RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.