Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Beal

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892No. 15,987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

— This case is in this court a second time. Bell v. Cox, 122 Ind. 153.

After its return to the circuit court a trial was had upon the issue joined upon the petition and remonstrance, which resulted in the approval of the report of the drainage commissioners, and an order for the construction of the ditch.

The first question discussed in the briefs of counsel relates to the ruling of the court in permitting the petition and report of the commissioners to be introduced and read in evidence.

It is now well settled that the reports of drainage commissioners are not competent evidence on an appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meranda v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Heick v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Anderson v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Turley v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Corey v. SwaggerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Musser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sauntman v. MaxwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Heyverests v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State ex rel. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API