Legal Opinion

Keefe v. Cropper

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Giukf, J.

The material facts in this case are not in dispute. The action was originally instituted to foreclose a real estate mortgage, but by amendment to the petition it is alleged that the mortgage is a purchase-money mort- , ,. ., ,. „ gage to secure the unpaid portion ox the consi¿era£[on a;n¿ prayS that the title and interest of the mortgagee be adjudged superior to the title and interest claimed by appellant Potter, whose title as an alleged subsequent purchaser for value, is predicated upon a judgment lien and purchase by execution sale thereunder.

The chronology of the various transactions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Thomas v. KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Loser v. Plainfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Brown v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Kaiser v. LembeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Freedom Financial Bank v. Estate of Edward J. BoesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Moser v. Thorp Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Knapp v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Troyer v. MundyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Securities Acceptance Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API