Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Leverette

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1977No. 14024PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

This case involves the question of whether our decision in Conner v. Griffith, W.Va., S.E.2d, (1977), should be applied retroactively. In Conner, we held that upon parole revocation, the failure to credit time spent on parole to the underlying sentence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the West Virginia Constitution.

Adkins filed this original proceeding for a writ of ha-beas corpus seeking to obtain the benefit of the Conner rule, even though his parole revocation occurred before that decision.

The concept of retroactivity determines how a case which substantially alters a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kincaid v. MangumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. KirtleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hendershot v. HendershotWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API