Legal Opinion
Knaust v. City of Kingston
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2002No. 1:96-cv-00601PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking injunctive relief and compensatory damages for an alleged taking of their real property as a result of the operations of the adjacent City of Kingston Business Park in Kingston, New York (“Business Park”), in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs also asserted two state law causes of action, alleging violations of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA,” Environmental Conservation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of AlbanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003