Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1943No. 10297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

This case has been before this court on two former appeals, 5 Cir., 100 F.2d 308, 309 and 5 Cir., 116 F.2d 885, 135 A.L.R. 1141. The nature and issues will not be repeated. In the first instance, the court below had directed a verdict in favor of the Continental Casualty Co., which we reversed, saying [100 F.2d 310]:

“Considering all of the evidence, we are of opinion that the court committed error in instructing the verdict for the appellee, and that the case should have gone to the jury for its determination.”

On the second appeal we found there had been error on two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. First Nat. Bank of Temple v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central National Chicago Corp. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Banco De San German, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API