Legal Opinion
Sendak v. Allen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1975No. 1-874A119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.
The Attorney General brings this appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of plaintiff sappellees, Allen and O’Risky, holding a state statute inapplicable to county policemen.
The issues upon appeal are whether the parties were entitled to declaratory relief as a matter of law and whether the trial court was correct in ruling that county policemen were not covered by IC 1971, 18-1-11-9 (Burns Code Ed.).
We affirm.
The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. Allen and O’Risky were police officers serving in the Vanderburgh County Sheriff’s Department, and both were declared…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Bryarly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- City of Mishawaka v. MohneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Wright v. KinnardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morris v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mathis v. Cooperative Vendors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lake County Plan Commission v. County Council of Lake CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Evansville v. GrissomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Marsym Development Corp. v. Winchester Economic Development CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.