Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1975No. 54 (1974)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

On this appeal, Powell presents several issues which go to the merits of the trial court’s finding that Powell’s refusal to submit to the chemical test was unreasonable and to the order suspending the operating privileges for sixty days.

However, before this court can consider the merits of a controversy, it must first be established that we have appellate court jurisdiction.

Neither party raised the issue of appealability in their briefs; nevertheless, it was raised at oral argument and the defendant subsequently responded in writing. Furthermore, parties cannot, either by failure to raise the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jaster v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Dumer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Mitler v. Associated Contractors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. JakubowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Hildebrand v. KeguWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. PercyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WolterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  3. Tadysak v. FohtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Heidel v. VoightDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
  5. Orlando Residence Ltd. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API