Legal Opinion

Bardis v. Stinson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 8, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MAVEN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Alexander Bardis and Monica Bardis appeal from the January 25, 2013 Law Division order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Kitty Stinson, Stinson Claims Services (collectively Stinson), and Cumberland Insurance Group (Cumberland) (collectively Defendants). The trial court found there was no coverage under plaintiffs’ homeowner’s insurance policy for the collapsed basement wall and other damages to their home allegedly caused by “hidden decay.” The court also rejected plaintiffs’ *230argument that “hidden defects”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. BoylanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Zacarias v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bardis v. StinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Derbyshire Baptist Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API