Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Perkins v. Perkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1996Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGoldstein, J.

and votes to modify the order and judgment, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof which adjudged that the plaintiff former wife had sole and complete ownership of the real estate property known as Middle Patent Farm as well as its contents and all of the antiques, furniture and furnishings acquired by the parties, and as so modified, to affirm the order and judgment insofar as appealed from, and to remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for equitable distribution of the marital property, with the following memorandum, in which Pizzuto, J., concurs: The parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Prudential Home Mortgage Co. v. Neildan Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Conti v. ContiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Arbor National Mortgage, Inc. v. GoldsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Claymont v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API