Legal Opinion

Chennault v. Stovall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1935No. 4946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

The petition alleges that plaintiff is the owner of a 7/39 interest in 240 acres of land in Richland parish; that he and his co-owners joined in a mineral lease of the tract to the Southern Carbon Company, which on or about November 19, 1930, brought in a gas well on the land, the initial production of which was 26,568,000 cubic feet; that on October 14, 1931, the Carbon Company abandoned the well and executed and recorded a release of its lease; that at the time of the abandonment and release petitioner was making arrangements to have said well deepened and cleaned out and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Vernon v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. James v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callender v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. HillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Callender v. MarksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API