Legal Opinion
Callender v. Marks
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1936No. 5183PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
This suit involves the demand for damages which was excluded in the companion case, bearing the same title, this day decided by us. 166 So. 891. The petition in that suit lacked sufficient allegations of fact to show negligence and fault on the part of defendant in the construction of the proposed reservoir, and, by reason of that, an exception of no cause of action was sustained resulting in the rejection of the demand for damages.
The petition herein,, which was filed October 11, 1933, contains allegations, regarding the nature, kind, and amount of damages claimed, identical…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- De Bouchel v. Koss Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Sims v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Callender v. MarksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Taglialavore v. EllerbeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. HillmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Callender v. MarksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937