Legal Opinion
In re Herken-Hoff
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1997No. 21718PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
OPINION
2Per curiam
TMs matter came before the Court for contempt proceedings pursuant to the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 34^1-2 and Rule 17-206(G) NMRA 1996 of the Rules Governing Discipline. W. Eugene Herkenhoff was ordered to appear before this Court to explain why he should not be sanctioned for the two findings of criminal contempt entered against him on November 14, 1996.
On December 22, 1993, we suspended respondent from the practice of law for violations of several of the Rules of Professional Conduct but deferred the suspension and placed him on supervised probation for…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. GreenwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Matter of KlecanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Seven Rivers Farm, Inc. v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of AvalloneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CaseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FrazierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Concha v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Matter of HerkenhoffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.