Legal Opinion
Matter of Herkenhoff
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1997No. 21718PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
931 P.2d 1382 (1997)
122 N.M. 766
1997-NMSC-7
In the Matter of W. Eugene HERKENHOFF, An Attorney Disbarred from Practice Before the Courts of the State of New Mexico.
No. 21718.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
January 27, 1997.
Virginia L. Ferrara, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Albuquerque.
W. Eugene Herkenhoff, Silver City, Pro Se.
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter came before the Court for contempt proceedings pursuant to the provisions of NMSA 1978, Section 34-1-2 and Rule 17-206(G) NMRA 1996 of the Rules Governing Discipline. W. Eugene Herkenhoff was ordered to appear before this Court to…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. GreenwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Matter of KlecanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Seven Rivers Farm, Inc. v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Matter of AvalloneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CaseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FrazierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- In Re ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Concha v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.