County of Glenn v. Foley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Following the grant of a motion in limine to exclude the testimony of the defense appraiser in this action for eminent domain, the parties stipulated to a valuation of the real property in the amount the appraiser for plaintiff County of Glenn (the County) had set, and the trial court entered judgment in accordance with this stipulation. Defendant Patrick Foley, trustee of a marital trust holding fee title to the subject property, filed a timely notice of appeal.1
Foley contends the use of a motion in limine to eviscerate his case violated his right to a jury trial; the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Legendary Investors Group No. 1, LLC v. NiemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pini v. Fenley CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Solano Transportation Authority v. Anderson CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021