Jones v. Julian

Suit by Jones against Julian, on a promissory note. Answer by way of counter-claim, setting up that the note was given for work done upon a special contract; that the work was not done according to the contract; that damages resulted, for which, it was claimed, the plaintiff was answerable to the defendant.

Replication in denial. Trial. Judgment for the defendant for eleven cents and costs.

During the progress of the cause, the plaintiff alleged that he had assigned the note, pendente lite, to one Lewis Jones, and moved the Court that he be substituted as plaintiff. The Court refused the motion.