Legal Opinion

City of Boulder v. Regents of the University of Colorado

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1972No. 25503PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

This action against the Regents involves an ordinance of the City of Boulder which provides for an admissions tax upon charges made to attend public events. Boulder sought a declaratory judgment and asked for judgment for past taxes. The trial court held the ordinance to be valid but, as applied to events held under the auspices of the University of Colorado, the defendant Regents of the University could not be compelled to collect the tax. We affirm in part and reverse in part as to the validity of the ordinance, and affirm the ruling that the Regents cannot be compelled to collect the tax.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Board of Regents of the Universities & State College v. City of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Marson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Church Divinity School of Pacific v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Watson v. Board of Regents of University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. City of Golden v. Aramark Educational Services, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. City of Morgantown v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Sheridan v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API