Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Western Electric

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 1985No. CA 84-443PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

Appellant, Jack M. Pitts, was found to be “currently totally disabled” at the time of his hearing before the Administrative Law Judge and was awarded total disability benefits for the duration of his disability. Appellant’s attorney was allowed “a controverted attorney’s fee on all permanent disability benefits in excess of 43.75 weeks.” Appellant’s attorney was subsequently allowed a lump sum attorney’s fee upon his motion by the ALJ. The employer, Western Electric, appealed to the Full Commission which reversed the lump sum attorney’s fee award on the basic premise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNeely v. Clem Mill & Gin CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. NealCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Bemberg Iron Works v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. City of Humphrey v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Secretary of State v. GuffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Arkansas Secretary of State v. GuffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API